<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.9.3 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Sat, 20 Mar 2010 23:44:11 GMT--><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:rss="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"><rss:channel rdf:about="http://www.bbtia.com/the-clubhouse/"><rss:title>The Clubhouse</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.bbtia.com/the-clubhouse/</rss:link><rss:description></rss:description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><dc:date>2010-03-20T23:44:11Z</dc:date><admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.squarespace.com/">Squarespace Site Server v5.9.3 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</admin:generatorAgent><rss:items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bbtia.com/the-clubhouse/2010/3/18/a-couple-of-site-announcements.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bbtia.com/the-clubhouse/2010/3/18/j-daniels-on-the-hardline-audio.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bbtia.com/the-clubhouse/2010/3/17/a-great-michael-ortiz-interview.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bbtia.com/the-clubhouse/2010/3/17/missing-the-point-on-chris-davis.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bbtia.com/the-clubhouse/2010/3/15/rangers-gameday-315-vs-sfg.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bbtia.com/the-clubhouse/2010/3/15/derek-hollands-sunday-outing.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bbtia.com/the-clubhouse/2010/3/15/regarding-that-mike-lowell-thing.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bbtia.com/the-clubhouse/2010/3/15/can-somebody-explain-this-to-me.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bbtia.com/the-clubhouse/2010/3/15/keith-law-scouts-some-rangers.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bbtia.com/the-clubhouse/2010/3/14/rangers-gameday-314-vs-ari.html"/></rdf:Seq></rss:items></rss:channel><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.bbtia.com/the-clubhouse/2010/3/18/a-couple-of-site-announcements.html"><rss:title>A Couple Of Site Announcements</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.bbtia.com/the-clubhouse/2010/3/18/a-couple-of-site-announcements.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Joey Matschulat</dc:creator><dc:date>2010-03-19T00:59:23Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'll keep this short and sweet, because brevity is generally a good thing -- first of all, Baseball Time in Arlington will be debuting a new contributor tomorrow morning. No, nobody's leaving or having their role reduced or anything of the sort ... this is a purely talent-driven move that we hope will provide a nice complement to the great work already being done around here. Your newest site contributor, Josh Garoon (a.k.a. "Snark," a name which might be familiar to LSB/BBTiA/NMLR regulars), will be dropping his first article sometime tomorrow morning, and I'm excited to have him on board.</p>
<p>Second, [edited out at the request of a third party. Sorry. You'll know soon enough.]</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.bbtia.com/the-clubhouse/2010/3/18/j-daniels-on-the-hardline-audio.html"><rss:title>J. Daniels On The Hardline [Audio]</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.bbtia.com/the-clubhouse/2010/3/18/j-daniels-on-the-hardline-audio.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Joey Matschulat</dc:creator><dc:date>2010-03-18T12:52:37Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some leftover audio from yesterday's media madhouse, as Mike Rhyner and Corby Davidson pelted Rangers general manager Jon Daniels with 10-plus minutes of questions vis-a-vis the Ron Washington situation:</p>
<p><script language="JavaScript" src="http://www.bbtia.com/storage/audio/audio-player.js"></script> <object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" data="http://www.bbtia.com/storage/audio/player.swf" id="audioplayer1" height="24" width="290">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.bbtia.com/storage/audio/player.swf">
<param name="FlashVars" value="playerID=1&amp;soundFile=http://www.bbtia.com/storage/audio/daniels031710.mp3">
<param name="quality" value="high">
<param name="menu" value="false">
<param name="wmode" value="transparent">
</object></p>
<p><em>[Direct link available <a href="http://www.bbtia.com/storage/audio/daniels031710.mp">here</a>.]</em></p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.bbtia.com/the-clubhouse/2010/3/17/a-great-michael-ortiz-interview.html"><rss:title>A Great Michael Ortiz Interview</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.bbtia.com/the-clubhouse/2010/3/17/a-great-michael-ortiz-interview.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Joey Matschulat</dc:creator><dc:date>2010-03-17T11:00:00Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some more <a href="http://rangers.scout.com/2/954666.html">Surprise-bred greatness from Scout.com's Jason Cole</a>, who files this marvelous interview on Rangers first base prospect Michael Ortiz (re-posted here with his permission) and the adversity he had to overcome en route to realizing his professional dreams. Special bonus scouting snippet from Jason Parks, as well. Read it up. It's quite a story.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">● ● ● ● ●</p>
<p><span class="storybody">From the time <a href="http://rangers.scout.com/a.z?s=324&amp;p=8&amp;c=1&amp;nid=4534695">Michael  Ortiz</a> decided to begin playing baseball at Miami's Palmetto High  School, all he wanted was a chance.</span></p>
<p>After playing just a handful of games at the varsity level in his entire  high school career, Ortiz got the opportunity of a lifetime when the  Texas Rangers selected him in the 28th round of the 2007 MLB Draft.</p>
<p>When the Rangers drafted Ortiz, they regarded him as a plus makeup,  high-character player that was talented, but understandably raw. The  club&ndash;and area scout Juan Alvarez in particular&ndash;liked the potential in  his bat, but they also knew he would be a bit of a project.</p>
<p>Ortiz proved himself as a solid line-drive hitter right out of the  gates, batting .302 with eight doubles and three homers in just 46 games  for the rookie-level AZL Rangers.</p>
<p>The 6-foot-2, 200-pound prospect began his second season at short-season  Spokane, but he was sent back to the rookie league after going 0-for-3  with three strikeouts in the first game of the season. He went on to  struggle during his second season in the AZL, hitting .256 with reduced  power.</p>
<p>Ortiz returned to the AZL once again in 2009, but he made the most of  the situation, becoming a more complete hitter. The 20-year-old began  going to the opposite field more often, and he looked more comfortable  facing left-handed pitching. Ortiz's results also improved, as he posted  a .304 average with 10 doubles and two round-trippers in 49 games.</p>
<p>In three seasons, Ortiz has spent almost all his time at the Rangers'  complex in Arizona, logging only 18 at-bats with Spokane. However, the  Rangers have stuck with the first baseman because of his tireless work  ethic and his potential with the bat.</p>
<p>As Ortiz explains below, he has become confident in himself as a hitter,  but he is looking to add game power in 2010. Ortiz is a very strong  player that consistently lines balls into the gap, but Baseball Time in  Arlington's Jason Parks says Ortiz is showing nice power in Spring  Training batting practice thus far.</p>
<p>&ldquo;He is showing some nice power to the pull side right now," he said.  &ldquo;He's using his legs and hips to generate good bat speed, his bat plane  has some good lift, and he's getting good extension. Ortiz is strong  enough to drive the ball when he extends.&rdquo;</p>
<p>The strides Ortiz has made over the past year, coupled with the Rangers'  lack of first base depth at the lower levels, could mean the prospect  has an opportunity to open the season at Single-A Hickory.</p>
<p>Regardless of where he begins the season, Ortiz has some potential in  his bat, and he has taken endless ground balls to improve his defensive  game at first base.</p>
<p>While most professional baseball players grow up dreaming about the game  throughout their lives, Ortiz didn't realize he wanted to be a baseball  player until much later on in life.</p>
<p>In the following interview, the prospect discusses his unique journey to  pro baseball along with his upcoming season and previous years with the  Rangers organization.</p>
<p><span class="storybody"> 
<hr />
</span></p>
<p><span class="storybody"><strong>Jason Cole: Over the offseason, how did you prepare for this year?</strong></span></p>
<p>Michael Ortiz: Coming off the season and instructional league, I was  feeling great about everything I had accomplished. I felt like I had  learned a lot and progressed. I'd taken huge strides, which gave me a  whole new outlook on the game.</p>
<p>Starting November 1, I got in the gym about six days per week. I was  just focusing mainly on hitting for power. In the gym the last few  years, I thought I had a plan. I thought I knew it all. But in reality, I  see all these guys that are progressing in front of me. I always  thought I could've progressed earlier, but looking back now, I didn't  prepare the right way. So this offseason was a completely new outlook.</p>
<p>I went in the gym, I was lifting heavy, I was lifting right. I studied  my body, I studied the science of weightlifting. I did everything I  could to just put as much power behind the baseball in my swing. Right  now, I feel great. Then January came around and I started getting on the  field, I started running, and doing all that stuff. Six days per week  pretty much the entire offseason, I was working as hard as I could just  to hit for more power.</p>
<p>The bottom line is that I feel like I've become a better hitter and I  feel like I have the right approach. Now I just need to put the power  into the equation because I'm a first baseman. I know&ndash;they haven't told  me&ndash;but I know they want me to hit for power. I want to keep my  strikeouts low and hopefully bring my power up this year. That's my  goal.</p>
<p><strong>Cole: Do you feel like a different hitter right now? Do you feel more  power behind the ball when you hit it?</strong></p>
<p>Ortiz: Definitely. Absolutely. All that work I did in the offseason  leading up to this first day of Spring Training&ndash;I felt it worked out  perfectly. Right now I feel a nice short, quick, compact swing, but I'm  still hitting the ball hard. I'm still driving the ball into the gap. I  want to stick with the same approach&ndash;I want to stay up the middle of the  field.</p>
<p>You see all these great hitters in our organization&ndash;look at Mitch  Moreland. If there's ever a guy that I've talked to about  baseball&ndash;hitting as a teammate&ndash;he knows. If I can follow the same plan,  maybe I can one day help the big club. I want to stick with the same  approach, but just hit for more power.</p>
<p><strong>Cole: You told me you also studied a lot of video over the offseason.  What were you watching and what were you getting out of that?</strong></p>
<p>Ortiz: I studied a lot of stuff from a guy named Charley Lau. He used to  be the famous hitting coach for the Kansas City Royals. He was George  Brett's first hitting coach. I studied him and his idea of what the  right swing is. I also studied a lot of Rudy Jaramillo's old methods,  and Luis Ortiz&ndash;I looked at his book. Also Clint Hurdle. Anything those  guys had to say about hitting, I studied. Those guys have been there,  and those guys know. I think if I can combine their thoughts with mine, I can become a great hitter. Who knows?</p>
<p>I also studied Albert Pujols and Joe Mauer. I know I'm a left-handed  hitter, but if you are a great hitter&ndash;whether you're right-handed or  left-handed&ndash;I can feed off that. I can study you. I feel like studying  all the great hitters in the big leagues&ndash;how their swing is, what their  approach is like at the plate, how they take pitches, what they do with  runners on base. Anything about hitting, I was on.</p>
<p>I'd work out all day and it'd be 10:00 at night, and I'd be on my laptop  on YouTube just searching all the hitters in baseball. There's nothing  more I want than to help the big league team and to be a player on that  team one day.</p>
<p><strong>Cole: I know Luis Ortiz is one of the roving hitting coordinators in  the Rangers system. Have you been able to talk to him about some of the  stuff you read in his book?</strong></p>
<p>Ortiz: I haven't talked to him as of right now about all the things I've  read, but he has this one book that is over 100 hitting drills. I'm just  studying all that stuff. He's just a giant brain. If you talk to that  guy about hitting, he knows it all. And he's great with each individual  hitter because he knows that each hitter is an individual. Mike  Boulanger and Jason Hart, too. Those guys know that every hitter is  different. They can help you individually without changing you. That's  why Texas is the best.</p>
<p><strong>Cole: Your results in the AZL in 2008 versus 2009 were pretty much  night and day. What made the difference for you?</strong></p>
<p>Ortiz: The difference for me was becoming a man. I came into  professional baseball with a lot of confidence and a lot of cockiness.  Like Ted Williams said, it's okay to be cocky. All the great hitters  are. But you've got to do it in a silent way. I came in and tried to  show everybody that I wanted to be a great player and I wanted to work  hard, but now I've realized that it's not about just showing them, it's  about doing your work the right way and letting it indirectly show on  the field. I feel that over the last year, I've developed this quiet  confidence that if I do my job the right way, I can help the team win  and I can play well.</p>
<p>For me, it was just maturity. The talent and the work ethic was always  there. I was always a hard worker, even before I played baseball. When I  wasn't playing baseball, I was out hitting a punching bag until 10:00  at night. For me, that's just my mentality. If I'm going to do  something, I'm going to do it the right way, and I'm going to have those  blinders on. It's like a race horse&ndash;they have those blinders. They're  not trying to look left or right&ndash;they're looking at the finish line.</p>
<p>For me, I always had that, but I didn't have the maturity. I feel like  over the last year I've matured and I'm becoming a man and I have to be a  man and just do my job. The bottom line is that I love baseball and I  have a great time, but it's a job. And if I don't do my job, I'm out.  And I understand that.</p>
<p><strong>Cole: You only played one year of high school baseball, correct?</strong></p>
<p>Ortiz: I played when I was a freshman&ndash;I played JV or whatever. Then I  quit and started boxing. So I boxed for a couple years, and my senior  year, I came back. But there was a new coach and because of team  chemistry, the coach thought it was better if I DHed and did whatever.</p>
<p>Basically I was a DH for 10 games, because I really only played 10 games  during the second half of the year. But we went to states. I had a good  time with it, but my high school baseball career was so short and  insignificant. The Texas Rangers were my first baseball team.</p>
<p><strong>Cole: With such little experience coming into pro ball, did you feel  it messed with your head a bit when you had your first extended slump in  2008?</strong></p>
<p>Ortiz: My first year, when I was in extended and I got into my first  slump&ndash;I never thought it was because I didn't have enough experience. I  thought, "I'm here now, and I have to act like I belong here.' And even  though I had struggles, and even though I wasn't mature enough and all  those things&ndash;looking back on it, I can't say that I regret anything.</p>
<p>I don't regret not playing high school baseball, and I don't regret  signing to play with the Texas Rangers. They've been great. They have  taught me everything I know. I don't regret any decisions I've ever  made, and I hope one day I can return the favor they've done for me by  showing them on the Major League field one day.</p>
<p><strong>Cole: Being a guy that hardly played high school baseball at all, how  did you get discovered and how did you get drafted?</strong></p>
<p>Ortiz: Coming into my senior year, there was a lot of hype about a new  kid that was playing high school baseball. This big kid with some tools.  The bottom line was that I had a couple tools, and I was one of the  bigger guys on my team. So I guess there was a lot of attention there.</p>
<p>But the real reason how I got exposed was&ndash;I remember waking up one day.  My dad was always trying to tell me to go back and play. He wanted me to  go play baseball because he knew one day, if I worked hard, I could be a  good baseball player. But I never really wanted to.</p>
<p>One day, I said, "Dad, I'm going to the batting cages." So I went to  those batting cages where they throw those yellow balls. And I went to  the 90 mph machine. It had been about two or three years since I had  hit, swung, or done anything. And I was just smashing the ball. I felt  great. I guess that triggered it for me. That made me realize that I  really can play baseball. I had no mindset that I'm going to play&ndash;I just  wanted to go to the batting cage. And I guess after that, I came home  and told my dad, "Look, I think I can do this."</p>
<p>So I went down to the high school field, and for about a week there, I  was trying to practice on my high school field. But I didn't tell any of  the guys on the team, and I didn't tell the coach. I would just sit  from three to six. I stopped boxing completely. I'd get out of school,  I'd go to the Coral Reef Park&ndash;where our high school team played&ndash;and I'd  sit on the other fields where no one could see me with my bat, bucket of  balls, and a tee. No glove&ndash;I didn't want to be seen by anybody. So I'd  sit on that back field and wait for three hours for the high school team  to finish.</p>
<p>Then when they would finish, I would go into their cage and just hit and  hit for days. Finally I went to the coach and said, "I want to try out.  I can play. Put me on the team." At first, he turned me down and told  me they had their team set already. I had that feeling of an apple in  your throat. I was totally distraught.</p>
<p>But I kept doing the same program&ndash;from three to six I'd wait on that  back field where nobody could see me. Then I guess one day, I was on the  field and nobody was there, but the coach stayed back to clean  something. He came back to the dugout and I was hitting off the tee. He  just saw me hitting and said, "I think maybe we can give you a shot." I  said, "Alright," but he put me on JV. I played a couple games there and I  did well. Then from there, I guess the rest is history.</p>
<p><strong>Cole: Leading up to the draft after your senior year, were you pretty  sure you would be picked or was it a complete uncertainty?</strong></p>
<p>Ortiz: It was a complete uncertainty. The place that I'd hit at&ndash;with the  batting cages&ndash;was owned by this guy named Juan Alvarez, who is the  scout in Florida for the Texas Rangers. He would see me in there all the  time, and I would go back all the time. After I'd hit on the high  school field, I'd go to the batting cages and see some live pitching.  I'd hit 300 balls per day, and he would be in there.</p>
<p>He would ask me, "Why are you hitting so much? Where do you play?" I  told him that I was trying to play high school baseball and that they  haven't given me a shot yet. Then finally, one day I told him, "Hey,  they put me on the team.' He was like, "Well good for you. Keep working  hard and keep coming here. My name is Juan Alvarez, and I'm a scout for  the Rangers. You've got a good body and good bat speed. Maybe I'll come  out to one of your games one of these days."</p>
<p>He came out to a couple games, and I had a couple good games. I guess he  told one guy and that guy told another guy, because before you know it,  there were 10 or 15 scouts at the games. But my high school coach  wouldn't let me play on the field. So basically you'd have 15 scouts at  the games watching me take infield practice and batting practice. Then  game time comes around and I'm sitting on the bench or DHing. Some days I  wouldn't even DH&ndash;I'd sit the bench.</p>
<p>And everyone was asking my coach, "Why isn't this kid playing? Why don't  you give him a chance?" But I never knew and nobody knew. Finally,  towards the end of the year, I came back and had some problems where I  missed a few games&ndash;I was ineligible with school. I was so concentrated  on practice that I kind of lost concentration on school. I wanted to  play so badly. So I signed a letter of intent to Miami-Dade Community  College because I thought that was my only option. But the draft came  around, and the Texas Rangers picked me in the 28th round.</p>
<p><strong>Cole: Given where you started, just going into the back fields and  hitting a ball off a tee, did you ever think you had any chance of  playing pro baseball?</strong></p>
<p>Ortiz: I've got to be honest&ndash;hitting off the tee after talking to that  coach, I remember walking into his classroom and when I asked him the  question to play and just him telling me no&ndash;that apple in my throat is a  feeling I never wanted to feel again. It's kind of like the same  feeling I got when I was called back from Spokane after one game and  three strikeouts. You just can't breathe, you can't see, and you can't  speak. You're just done.</p>
<p>And I remember telling myself that I never wanted to feel that again  after he told me that. So I would practice and practice and practice  until my hands would bleed. I'd have calluses that would bleed in the  shower. It wasn't a good feeling.</p>
<p>But never did I think I would get drafted&ndash;no. My goal was to just play  baseball because I wasn't even on a team yet. But I guess everything  escalated once I met Juan Alvarez&ndash;him and another guy named Alex Mesa,  who at the time was a scout for the Red Sox that invited me to workouts.  Those two guys&ndash;without them, I would not be here. I would not be in the  Texas Rangers' system.</p>
<p>So they started it all, and the Texas Rangers have taken it from there. I  couldn't be happier and I can't express my feelings. These guys have  done so much for me. Like I said, one day I will return the favor to the  Major League club.﻿</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.bbtia.com/the-clubhouse/2010/3/17/missing-the-point-on-chris-davis.html"><rss:title>Missing The Point On Chris Davis</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.bbtia.com/the-clubhouse/2010/3/17/missing-the-point-on-chris-davis.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Joey Matschulat</dc:creator><dc:date>2010-03-17T10:34:22Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know spring training is a time for renewal and hope and optimism and all of that good stuff, but it has gotten completely out of hand now (<a href="http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/spt/baseball/rangers/stories/031710dnspocowlishaw.3a6faa0.html">via Tim Cowlishaw</a>):</p>
<p><span class="vitstorybody"><span class="vitstorybody">
<p><em>In  Oklahoma City, Davis regained his swing. After he returned to Texas         in late August, Davis led the Rangers in batting (.308), RBIs (26)  and        slugging (.496).</em></p>
<p><em>For those who thought  spring training in 2010 was all about Smoak, the        Rangers'  first-round 2008 draft pick, taking control of first base,        think  again.</em></p>
<p><em>Davis entered Tuesday's game against the  Cubs with a team-leading .538        average. He ended last week with a  streak of eight straight hits.</em></p>
</span></span></p>
<p>There's more at the link, obviously, but let's ignore that for the time being. Cowlishaw doesn't miss the mark on his Justin Smoak commentary, but the implication in the first quoted paragraph is that Davis, after returning from Triple-A Oklahoma City last August, was a dominant offensive force. 140-odd plate appearances of .308/.338/.496 offense is pretty solid, but as <a href="http://www.bbtia.com/home/2010/3/9/chris-davis-and-the-hype-machine.html">we already examined last week</a>, his batted-ball rates didn't support the sky-high BABIP he posted (using xBABIP, it was more like .275/.315/.465-level offense), and here's the really important thing to bear in mind ... his BB/K ratio during that period was still awful.&nbsp;</p>
<p><em>[And here's the thing about spring training statistics: if they're really good and work in your favor, they're held up in a positive light by the media, but if they suck, then they're spun as a by-product of something ambiguous like, say, a player "working on some things," or "fighting through a minor injury," or just ignored altogether. I'm glad that Davis is hitting well, but let's not go overboard here.]<br /></em></p>
<p>Further down, Cowlishaw acknowledges Davis's high strikeout numbers, but then writes the following: "But high  strikeout numbers hardly make Davis an anomaly in today's game.         There were 40 American League batters with more than 100 strikeouts in         2009. If Davis is hitting for the kind of  power he has displayed often enough,        the Rangers will live with  the misses to get the big hits." Look, I love big power numbers as much as the next guy, but no, if Davis doesn't somehow raise his BB/K ratio above 0.30, the Rangers <strong>are not</strong> going to live with the misses, because that profile is not conducive to long-term offensive success -- or, for that matter, sustainability -- at the major league level. At all.</p>
<p>Among those aforementioned 40 batters with 100 or more strikeouts, the average walk rate was 10.6 percent. Davis? 5.7 percent, good for the third-worst showing in that sample. Average BB/K ratio? 0.50? Davis? 0.16, good for the second-worst showing in that sample. None of that is to say that Davis can't improve his approach and achieve respectability in these metrics, but to dismiss the huge, huge underlying problem in Davis's offensive skill set by saying "he strikes out a lot, but so do lots of other hitters, so it's not a big deal so long as he keeps hitting for power" is, in my mind, rather intellectually dishonest.</p>
<p><span class="vitstorybody"><span class="vitstorybody"> </span></span></p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.bbtia.com/the-clubhouse/2010/3/15/rangers-gameday-315-vs-sfg.html"><rss:title>Rangers Gameday: 3/15 Vs. SFG</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.bbtia.com/the-clubhouse/2010/3/15/rangers-gameday-315-vs-sfg.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Joey Matschulat</dc:creator><dc:date>2010-03-16T00:45:41Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><strong><a href="http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/gameday/index.jsp?gid=2010_03_15_sfnmlb_texmlb_1">Monday, March 15th Game Preview</a><br /></strong>San Francisco Giants (9-4) vs. Texas Rangers (4-6)<br />Madison Bumgarner (0-0, 4.50 ERA) vs. Rich Harden (1-0. 7.71 ERA)<br />8:05 p.m. CST in Surprise, Arizona (Surprise Stadium)<br />TV: FSNSW | Radio: KRLD 105.3 FM</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Pre-Game Notes:</strong> No Chris Davis tonight, although that disappointment is mitigated by the opportunity to get a look at 25th-man candidate Matt Brown at first base. Harden is expected to be followed by Doug Mathis (3-4 innings) and Darren O'Day (1-2 innings). This post will be moved into <a href="http://www.bbtia.com/the-clubhouse/">The Clubhouse</a> -- as will all other Gameday posts this season -- about an hour or two after the game's conclusion, in the interest of keeping the highest-quality site content on the front page for as long as possible.</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.bbtia.com/the-clubhouse/2010/3/15/derek-hollands-sunday-outing.html"><rss:title>Derek Holland's Sunday Outing</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.bbtia.com/the-clubhouse/2010/3/15/derek-hollands-sunday-outing.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Joey Matschulat</dc:creator><dc:date>2010-03-15T23:00:22Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the heels of Keith Law's <a href="http://www.bbtia.com/the-clubhouse/2010/3/15/keith-law-scouts-some-rangers.html">largely optimistic scouting report on Derek Holland</a> comes this video of his three-inning performance yesterday:</p>
<p><object width="528" height="300"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=10190127&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=0&amp;show_byline=0&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=59a5d1&amp;fullscreen=1" /><embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=10190127&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=0&amp;show_byline=0&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=59a5d1&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width="528" height="300"></embed></object></p>
<p><em>[Direct link available <a href="http://texas.rangers.mlb.com/media/video.jsp?content_id=7193459">here</a>.]</em></p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.bbtia.com/the-clubhouse/2010/3/15/regarding-that-mike-lowell-thing.html"><rss:title>Regarding That Mike Lowell Thing</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.bbtia.com/the-clubhouse/2010/3/15/regarding-that-mike-lowell-thing.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Joey Matschulat</dc:creator><dc:date>2010-03-15T22:00:08Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lone Star Ball's Adam J. Morris <a href="http://www.lonestarball.com/2010/3/15/1374178/mike-lowell-starting-at-first-base">revisits the Mike Lowell-to-Texas idea</a>, noting that the Red Sox rolled Lowell out at first base in today's spring training game -- a lineup move that seems motivated by a desire to let other teams note that he's capable of handling the defensive duties of the position -- and wondering if the Rangers have dispatched a scout to observe the proceedings.</p>
<p>David <a href="http://www.bbtia.com/home/2010/3/13/being-jon-daniels-scenario-no-1.html">threw out</a> the Boggs/Moreland/MaxRam/Beltre quadumvirate on Saturday as potential trade bait in a Lowell deal, but I think there are a few problems with this entire idea that didn't exist back in December: first, Lowell, if acquired by the Rangers, can't be viewed as the potential 400-500 PA guy that he was before the Vladimir Guerrero signing was finalized; there simply won't be that much playing time to go around, in which case he's going to be viewed as more of a 200-300 PA player (if that), with the bulk of his utility coming from playing time against left-handers whom Chris Davis should sit against. Granted, Lowell doesn't really have much choice in where he goes, but I think it's fair to question just how much "leadership value" he would bring to the table if he's ticked about being marginalized.</p>
<p>And second, if you're acquiring Lowell strictly as a part-time/bench player as opposed to the 400-500 PA guy that you were probably trading for back when, are you still inclined to relinquish Max Ramirez? Because I know I'm not.</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.bbtia.com/the-clubhouse/2010/3/15/can-somebody-explain-this-to-me.html"><rss:title>Can Somebody Explain This To Me?</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.bbtia.com/the-clubhouse/2010/3/15/can-somebody-explain-this-to-me.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Joey Matschulat</dc:creator><dc:date>2010-03-15T21:00:51Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PECOTA's <a href="http://www.bbtia.com/home/2010/2/4/regarding-pecota-the-rangers.html">projected AL West standings</a>, as of February 4th:</p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.bbtia.com/storage/files/pecota020310.png?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1268684586123" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p>A couple of weeks later, BP's Jay Jaffe wrote about these projections in further detail, with the revised projections putting Texas at 87 wins, Seattle at 83 wins, Oakland at 82 wins and Los Angeles at 76 wins.</p>
<p>A couple of days ago, Trip pointed out that PECOTA suddenly had the Rangers at 80 wins (?!), and today's current PECOTA projections have Seattle at 89 wins, Oakland at 87 wins, Texas at 85 wins and Los Angeles at 80 wins. Since that February 4th update, BP has lopped 48 runs off the Rangers' projected runs scored in 2009 and subtracted 18 runs from the runs allowed column. Previous team offensive projection? .278/.350/.464. Today's team offensive projection? .267/.334/.430. It might be my imagination, but I think this is just about the most pre-season variation I've ever seen in PECOTA, at least on a team-wide level.</p>
<p>I suppose that the remarkably high beta on this 2010 team means that we shouldn't really care too much about the team-wide 50th percentile projections, but I'm not sure I'm understanding why PECOTA projects that this team will score fewer runs than last year's team more than 50 percent of the time.</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.bbtia.com/the-clubhouse/2010/3/15/keith-law-scouts-some-rangers.html"><rss:title>Keith Law Scouts Some Rangers</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.bbtia.com/the-clubhouse/2010/3/15/keith-law-scouts-some-rangers.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Joey Matschulat</dc:creator><dc:date>2010-03-15T20:50:00Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like Law has taken a fair-sized beating for what has been perceived by some as, uh, "premature" scouting reports (in the sense that some believe he is painting a bleak picture for the likes of Tommy Hunter and Rich Harden solely on the basis of early-to-mid March scouting observations), but ignoring an extremely valuable source of scouting information because of some perceived injustice is silly, because let's be perfectly frank -- <a href="http://insider.espn.go.com/mlb/blog?name=law_keith">that information is really, really good</a> (and if you can snag a cheap ESPN Insider subscription from somewhere, it's definitely worth it if only because of Law's writing)</p>
<p><em>● Ogando was 93-96 [mph] on Wednesday, by which I mean he threw 10 fastballs -- with nothing under 93, while hitting 96 three times. He threw a couple of sliders at 81-82 [mph] that had the two-plane break of a hard curveball, and threw them for strikes, while turning over one changeup at 85 mph. He comes from a low 3/4 slot with outstanding arm speed and gets on top of his fastball as well as his change. He takes a short stride and lands a little awkwardly, although given the stuff that comes out of his arm and his probable role as a reliever the Rangers probably won't want to tinker with him too much. Ogando is now listed at 26 but hasn't pitched above the Dominican Summer League; given his age and stuff he could move quickly through the system if his command matches his years rather than his experience.</em></p>
<p><em>● Neftali Feliz was his usual self, 91-96 [mph] most of the time but dialing it up higher than that when he needed something extra, hitting 99 once (the ball away to Ichiro Suzuki in the fifth inning) and 97-plus five times in two innings. He threw a few of the best curveballs I've ever seen from him, and while it was inconsistent, it's reassuring to see that he has the ability to snap off a breaking ball like the best ones he showed on Wednesday, with tight rotation and very late downward break. Feliz deserved a better fate in this game; he gave up a two-out flyball to Mike Sweeney that was misplayed by erstwhile rightfielder Mitch Moreland into a bases-clearing double. Feliz could have made a better pitch there -- Sweeney's bat is so slow that Feliz should be pounding the heck out of him on the inner half, but instead went away with the heat. A regular rightfielder makes that play.</em></p>
<p><em></em><em>● Speaking of Moreland, he's gotten some buzz so far this spring because of his bat, but his misadventure in right field raised the question again of where he'll play. He's a hard worker and not a terrible athlete, but lack of speed and agility are probably going to limit him either to first base (which is Justin Smoak's position long-term) or to left field (where he'd </em><em>be below-average but probably playable). He showed good plate coverage on Wednesday and made a key adjustment from his first at-bat against a left-handed pitcher to his second one. He may just be a valuable trade piece for the Rangers this summer when they're fighting for the division title.</em></p>
<p><em></em><em>● Texas starter Derek Holland, fighting for a spot in the Rangers' rotation, spent much of his outing on Sunday against the Dodgers working on his curve and especially his slider, using the latter in changeup counts even though he has an above-average change. Holland worked at 90-92, touching 93 once, and was generally around the plate, with some tail -- reminding me of that old baseball saw about left-handers having natural movement on their fastballs. He also had good depth on his curveball. His slider was less consistent, probably an average pitch on balance, with some showing good tilt and others tending to flatten out a little.</em></p>
<p><em>He's going to have to continue throwing it in games often for it to improve, as it looks like he is still improving his feel for the pitch, but by mid-season he could be a four-pitch lefty with good command and no pitch worse than average if that feel for the slider comes.</em></p>
<p><em>● Rangers right-hander Alexi Ogando had the same velocity he had when I saw him last week, but didn't have much feel for either breaking ball and wasn't commanding his fastball either. Another right-hander, Pedro Strop, showed a very straight 88-93 mph fastball and a slurvy breaking ball with a max-effort delivery and, shockingly, below-average command.</em></p>
<p><em></em><em>● Texas lefty Mike Kirkman threw about a half-dozen pitches before leaving when a comebacker nicked the side of his face -- he's OK! -- but I did like the little I saw, fastball 89-93 [mph], hard-breaking curve at 78-81, with one changeup mixed in. He even threw the curve at a right-handed hitter's back foot for a strikeout just before he exited the game. Kirkman and Withrow are two of the few pitchers in pro ball who developed "the thing" (the one where you can't throw a strike in a game if your life depended on it, also called "the yips" or "Steve Blass Disease") and recovered from it to have anything approaching normal control.</em></p>
<p><em></em><em>● Chris Davis showed a good approach in his first two at-bats on Sunday, staying back on balls away instead of trying to pull everything and finishing with a couple of hits for his efforts. Justin Smoak is right behind him, but Texas doesn't seem inclined to rush Smoak, especially since he's been slowed by a minor hip flexor injury this month.</em><em> </em><em>&nbsp;</em></p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.bbtia.com/the-clubhouse/2010/3/14/rangers-gameday-314-vs-ari.html"><rss:title>Rangers Gameday: 3/14 Vs. ARI</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.bbtia.com/the-clubhouse/2010/3/14/rangers-gameday-314-vs-ari.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Joey Matschulat</dc:creator><dc:date>2010-03-14T21:00:00Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><strong><a href="http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/gameday/index.jsp?gid=2010_03_14_arimlb_texmlb_1">Sunday, March 14th Game Preview</a><br /></strong>Arizona Diamondbacks (5-5) vs. Texas Rangers (4-4)<br />3:05 p.m. CST in Surprise, Arizona (Surprise Stadium)<br />TV: TXA-21 | Radio: KRLD 1080 AM</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item></rdf:RDF>