Latest Forum Topics
Search
Standings
Team W L GB
Texas
23 14 - - -
Oakland 19 18 4.0
Seattle 16 21 7.0
Los Angeles 16 22 7.5
Sponsors

Featured Article

Joey Matches on the potential Ian Kinsler contract extension

More Sponsors
Sponsors

« The Frank Francisco Situation | Main | Overreactions To A Losing Series »
Saturday
Apr102010

Highest Ceilings In The Rangers System: Chad Bell (#24)

Chad Bell - Photo courtesy of Scott LucasThe following series will count down the 25 highest ceilings (based on AOFP grades) in the Rangers' minor league system. I have scouted every player on the list in person and compiled the grades using those observations, conversations with respected voices in the Rangers' community like Lone Star Dugout's Jason Cole, and conversations with numerous scouts. Being a subjective exercise, opinions will vary on the individual tool grades, and ultimately, on the final tool projections.

Before we discuss the scouting scale and my methods of evaluation, it's important to note that the AOFP-based rankings below differ from the prospect rankings you may be more accustomed to seeing. The grades here are based on raw tools, and aren't intended to capture each player's most realistic ceiling. Age, league, and other contextual factors are generally excluded, although younger players have more room for development and therefore can receive the benefit of such an abstract view.

It should also be noted that this series was designed to highlight players currently playing in the Rangers' minor league system. For example: a player like Neftali Feliz, whose composite grades would rank him in the top tier of prospects in the system, will be excluded from this list because he is currently on the 25-man roster and not likely to spend any time on the farm.

The Scouting Scale/Methods:

For each tool (hitter) or individual offering (pitcher), a scout assigns the player a grade on a numerical scale that runs from 20 to 80 in five-point increments. 50 is major-league average, and 80 represents the top available score. The sides of the tool bell curve are extremely steep, and there's not much space beneath the curve's tails. In other words, there are very, very few players with 80-caliber tools, and lots of prospects whose tools score a 50. Because of this, scouts may also assign qualitative descriptors (e.g., "fringe-average," "solid-average") to modify scores of 50 that don't quite warrant a bump down to 45 or up to 55.

The scout averages the tool grades to produce an "Overall Future Potential" (OFP) grade. (As a result, OFP also has a 20-to-80 range, but isn't limited to scores ending in "5" or "0.") After OFP is calculated, a scout can adjust it based on his observation, experience, and intuition. This results in an AOFP: the "A" stands for "adjusted." An AOFP above 60 is generally indicative of an elite prospect: a guy with the potential to star in a championship-caliber lineup, rotation, or bullpen.

An AOFP of 55-59 typically implies a prospect that will be a first-division starter, including a solid No. 2 or No. 3 starter, front-line reliever, or second-tier closer. AOFPs in the 50-54 range suggest a solid-average major leaguer, including back-of-the-rotation starters and some late-inning arms who fall just below having "front-line" status. Players with AOFPs lower than 50 are usually fringe-average players like utility infielders, fourth/fifth outfielders, and middle relievers. Not a single player on this list will have an AOFP below 54.

The Players:

Name: Chad Bell
DOB: 2/28/1989
Birthplace: Knoxville, TN
HT/WT: 6' 3"/200 lb.
Bats/Throws: R/L

Arm action: Good
Delivery/Mechanical characteristics: Clean; High 3/4
Physical description:
Tall and proportioned with strong base and core; physically mature

Abilities: Well-balanced arsenal with polish and control projection. FB is sneaky with good velocity for lefty and some natural sink. CU has some fade to the armside and velocity variance at 80/81. CB is very promising pitch with good play off FB and tight, vertical break. Command of the CB is best secondary attribute. Fields position well and has a good move to 1B.

Weaknesses: Doesn’t offer much projection, with tools nearing a developmental peak. Doesn’t stay on top of CU resulting in a flat-plane pitch; needs to stay in arm-slot and remain mechanically consistent in order to play off FB. FB/CB combination can miss bats and induce weak contact, but needs to avoid nibbling and trust sustainable velocity. With runners on, can be deliberate to plate with multiple 1.55-1.65 release times. Has tendency to fall off toward 3B in follow-through and doesn’t always use size and high arm-slot to pitch downhill.

Conclusion: Didn't change OFP grade. Polished collegiate lefty with plus CB potential, slightly above-average FB grade, and a CU that should eventually grade out as solid-average/slightly above-average. Lacks elite stuff, but can change speeds with FB and locate his CB in any count against both LH/RH. Needs overall command refinement and trust in CU will help in sequencing and overall pitch deception. Tool-based projection: 54; solid-average #4/#5 starter at the major league level.

 

[Special thanks to Deric McKamey, Josh Garoon, and Joey Matschulat. Follow me on Twitter @ProfessorParks.]

Reader Comments (6)

Question for Jason or Joey: On the tags, I clicked on the Scouting Series tag and this post was there, but not the Boscan one. Both show up under the prospects tag. Will all these be under the scouting tag?

Thanks for another good read, Jason, really enjoying this series. Do you have any detailed reports for players from other orgs? If so, I'd love to read short capsules for some of them also.

April 10, 2010 at 8:16 AM | Unregistered Commentert ball

t ball: Going forward, this series will be under the "Highest Ceilings in the System" tag. Sorry for tag confusion.

I have notes on other players but I haven't written any detailed reports. After this series I might explore that. Good idea.

April 10, 2010 at 8:31 AM | Unregistered CommenterJason Parks

Jason - Your report on Bell's stuff sounds remarkably similar to that of Tommy Hunter from a couple of years ago. I assume that Bell will not have Hunter's control. Do you think that Bell will be more effective that Hunter in producing strikeouts?

April 10, 2010 at 2:45 PM | Unregistered Commenterdavid

David: I'm not sure. Bell has a better all-around arsenal than Hunter, at least on paper, but only time will tell how his tools translate to professional ball. He forces weak contact and has a very good out pitch in the CB, but I don't think he's going to be a big strikeout guy. I'm not a big fan of comps, but Bell reminds me of Zach Duke.

April 10, 2010 at 3:05 PM | Unregistered CommenterJason Parks

I played with and against Bell in high school and while I can't guarantee he'll make good I can say he's going to do whatever it takes to keep getting better. The scariest thing about Bell is he wasn't even that great of a player until his sophomore year in high school so he may have more late bloom in there.

September 9, 2010 at 8:44 AM | Unregistered CommenterBen

Finish off a lovely and elegant evening appear as you carry this Dior Ultimate Rendez-Vous wholesale canvas bags together with your just about every ensemble. It truly is indeed a classic purse that could too instill a classic magnificence to your entire fa?ade, even letting you portray a goddess-like image when completely matched using a stunning gown or cocktail dress. replica designer handbags

September 27, 2010 at 3:02 AM | Unregistered Commenterlinux
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.