Search
BBTiA Pick of the Week
  • The Texas Rangers: The Authorized History
    The Texas Rangers: The Authorized History
    by Eric Nadel
Powered by Squarespace
Sponsors
« Rangers Gameday: 7/1 Vs. LAA | Main | Rangers Gameday: 6/30 Vs. LAA »
Wednesday
01Jul2009

Fastball Velocity, Pitching Performance And Rangers Starting Pitchers

Low-A Hickory southpaw Martin Perez wields one of the best heaters in the Rangers' farm system. - Scott Lucas/The Ranger RundownWhen asked about Wilfredo Boscan, Rangers Minor League Pitching Coordinator Danny Clark said, "Well, the fastball is 89 [mph] or so, but I think that Boscan commands everything so well to both sides of the plate that makes up for it. His upside is big because of that. It's not all about velocity and he's still got some growing to do."

On the surface, the quote makes a lot of sense. A baseball thrown at 95 mph reaches home plate only two-hundredths of a second faster than a ball thrown at 90 mph and only three-hundredths of a second faster than a ball thrown at 88 mph. Perhaps those of us who like to track player development are too hung up on fastball velocity.

Looking to confirm the folly of fastball velocity, I used FanGraphs to capture the Pitch f/x data for all starting pitchers who logged at least 120 innings in 2008. The pitchers were sorted based upon the average velocities of their fastballs. I then took 10 player rolling averages (see explanation at bottom of article) of the ERAs, FIPs (fielding-independent ERA), K/9, BB/9, BAA, BABIP, HR/9, and LOB%. The results are presented in the three graphs below:

Contrary to expectations, there was a very strong correlation between fastball velocity and ERA. The ten starting pitchers with the highest fastball velocities had an average ERA of 3.70. Pitchers with fastball velocities of 90 mph or less had an average ERA of greater than 4.50. FIP follows essentially the same path as ERA. As one would expect, there was a very strong correlation between fastball velocity and strike-out rate. Surprisingly, there was very little difference between the walk rates of the pitchers who throw hard and those who do not. The consistency of the walk rate at approximately three walks per nine innings likely reflects a threshold of control that must be achieved for pitchers to succeed as starters at the major league level.

Given the correlation between fastball velocity and ERA/FIP/strikeout rate, it is not surprising that hitters have lower batting averages against starting pitchers with higher fastball velocities. As with the ERA graph, the batting average against (BAA) rises as fastball velocity decreases from 94 mph to approximately 90 mph, at which point the BAA remains relatively unchanged for the pitchers with fastball velocities below 90 mph. The variance in BAA appears to derive almost exclusively from strikeout rates, since the BABIP is essentially the same regardless of fastball velocity. The dip in both BAA and BABIP on the right-hand side of the graph results from Justin Duchscherer, whose 86 mph fastball produced a BAA of .211 and a BABIP of .240 in 2008.

Average home run rates and left-on-base percentages for pitchers classified by fastball velocity were plotted together, not because there is a correlation between the two but because they have similar values. The data indicates that pitchers with high velocity fastballs give up fewer home runs and are perhaps slightly more effective at stranding runners who get on base. These data contradict the notion that fastball velocity, at least among pitchers who become major league starters, is not that important.

For those of you who don't like graphical representations of data, some of the most interesting data from above is provided in tabular form below:

- - -
> 92.5 mph
90 - 92.5 mph
87.5 - 90.0 mph
< 87.5 mph
Avg. ERA
3.72
3.90
4.53
4.34
Avg. FIP
3.54
4.08
4.52
4.47
Avg. K/9
8.36
6.89
5.96
5.67
Avg. BB/9
2.89
2.96
2.78
2.72
Avg. HR/9
0.81
0.96
1.17
1.10
# Pitchers
19
47
24
17


91 MPH IS A SIGNIFICANT INFLECTION POINT

One of the more interesting breakpoints in the data occurs at 91 mph. Thirty-six of the 46 pitchers (78 percent) with average fastball velocities above 91 mph in 2008 had ERAs below 4.00. In contrast, only 19 of the 60 pitchers (31 percent) with fastball velocities below 91 mph had ERAs below 4.00. The average ERA for pitchers with average fastball velocities above 91 mph was 3.69 in 2008, while the average ERA for the remaining pitchers was 4.37. As with the graphs and table above, it is difficult to deny the very strong correlation between fastball velocity and the performances of major league starting pitchers.

FASTBALL VELOCITY, TOP-OF-THE-ROTATION STARTERS, AND PITCH USE

To move this from a population study to a consideration of individual pitchers, I sorted the pitchers using FIP and placed them into groups of 30. In theory, the top 30 pitchers could be considered No. 1 pitchers for 2008, the next 30 could be considered No. 2 pitchers, and so on. The average fastball velocities and pitch use for the No. 1, No. 2, No. 3 and No. 4 pitchers are presented in the table below.

FIP Ranking
FB Velocity > 91 mph
FB %
CU %
Other %
Top 30
25 (84%)
59%
13%
28%
31-60
12 (40%)
58%
11%
31%
61-90
7 (23%)
57%
12%
31%
91-106
2 (13%)
64%
11%
25%


[CU = Change-up; Other = curveball + slider + cutter + knuckleball + undetermined]

As expected, almost all of the pitchers with FIPs that are among the top 30 in the league had average fastball velocities above 91 mph. The five outliers were Derek Lowe, Brandon Webb, Cliff Lee, Cole Hamels, and Justin Duchscherer. Lowe and Webb rely on outstanding sinkers, while Lee and Hamels have very good secondary pitches. Duchscherer is an outlier on the list, though it is worth noting that he used his fastball less than 44 percent of the time in 2008, which is significantly below the 60 percent fastballs that the rest of the group used.

Of the 21 pitchers with fastball velocities above 91 mph who were ranked outside the top 30 in FIP in 2008, the majority have relatively little major league experience. Matt Garza, Ricky Nolasco, Felix Hernandez, Ubaldo Jimenez, Justin Verlander, Matt Cain, Manny Parra, Nick Blackburn, Ian Snell, Johnny Cueto, and Edwin Jackson are presumably still trying to figure out how to be effective against major league hitters. Consistent with that notion, Hernandez, Jimenez, Verlander, Cueto, and Jackson are all having very good 2009 campaigns.

Interestingly, there is not a lot of variance in pitch use by any of the groups of pitchers. Major league pitchers tend to average 58 percent fastballs, 30 percent breaking balls, and 12 percent change-ups regardless of whether they are top- or back-of-the-rotation types. An exception is the group of pitchers with fastballs that average greater than 91 mph but whose FIPs place them in the bottom half of pitchers. The high-velocity, ineffective pitchers averaged 72 percent fastballs in 2008, suggesting that ineffective secondary pitches are likely limiting their ability to succeed.

SUMMARY

Succeeding as a major league pitcher clearly requires more than a quality fastball. Command, control, pitch movement, and at least a couple of secondary pitches are all prerequisites for pitchers to become mainstays in a major league rotation. Among those pitchers who can master the elements of being a quality starter, fastball velocity is perhaps the most important factor in distinguishing the top-of-the-rotation types from those who are manning the No. 3, No. 4 and No. 5 slots.

AND FOR THOSE WHO WANT TO KNOW HOW THE RANGERS' STARTERS STACK UP ...

Of the current Rangers starters, Derek Holland (93.2 mph), Vicente Padilla (91.9 mph), Scott Feldman (91.0 mph), and Matt Harrison (91.0 mph) are all averaging at least 91 mph on their fastballs.

(1) Holland's fastball ranks in the top 20 among starters in the majors. He is using his fastball too much (75 percent), so developing his slider and change-up will likely be the key to becoming the top-of-the-rotation type that his fastball suggests that he can be.

(2) Padilla's high walk rate (4.3 BB/9) and pedestrian strikeout rate (4.7 K/9) suggest that he will continue to be an enigma despite having the fastball of a top-of-the-rotation pitcher.

(3) Feldman's mix of pitches (63 percent fastball, 8 percent change-up, 29 percent other) and walk rate (3.0 BB/9) are about right. Like the rest of the Rangers' starters, his strikeout rate is low (4.7 K/9), though that has yet to impact his effectiveness.

(4) According to Pitch f/x, Harrison is throwing five different pitches (four-seamer, two-seamer, curveball, change-up, cutter). His control has been very good (2.9 BB/9), though his inability to strike hitters out (4.8/9) remains a cause for concern.

Among the many Rangers prospects, Neftali Feliz, Martin Perez, Michael Main, Blake Beavan, and hopefully Tanner Scheppers appear to be on their way to having the pieces necessary to be top-of-the-rotation type starters.

(1) Feliz's fastball will likely have him at the top of the list when he graduates to the majors. Becoming a quality major leaguer will require that he develop two secondary pitches that he can use in 30-40 percent of his offerings. Feliz also needs to improve his control so that he can reduce his walk rate from the 4.6 walks per nine innings that he has produced this year in AAA-ball.

(2) Despite being just 18 years old, Martin Perez apparently has two of the four elements of a top-of-the-rotation starter -- a fastball that is reaching the mid-90s and a swing-and-miss curveball. An improved change-up and improved control (Perez is currently walking 3.5 batters per nine innings at Low-A Hickory) are on the short list of things that he needs to master.

(3) Reports from the 2008 Fall Instructional League had Main throwing three quality pitches. His low-90s fastball would likely allow him to exceed the 91 mph threshold that separates many very good major league pitchers from those who are merely adequate. Consistency and control appear to be the two factors that separate Main from a major league career.

(4) Reports indicate that Beavan is now consistently throwing a four-seamer at 91-93 mph. He already has the control of a major leaguer (2.0 BB/9). If he is able to add a consistent slider and change-up to his 91-plus mph four-seamer and quality two-seamer, then Beavan looks to have the stuff and control of a quality major league starter.

(5) He's not in the system yet, but Scheppers' mid-90s fastball and plus slider/curveball are the stuff of a future No. 1 pitcher. Scheppers walked 4.3 batters per nine innings in his last year in college, so improved control will likely be among the most important developmental milestones for the big right-hander once he joins the Rangers' system.

[Rolling Averages: The rolling averages used to produce the first three graphs used stats from ten pitchers at a time. The first group of ten pitchers comprised those who had the ten highest fastball velocities. The second group comprised the pitchers with the 2nd through 11th highest fastball velocities. The third group comprised the pitchers with the 3rd through 11th highest fastball velocities. And so on through the final group which comprised pitchers with the ten lowest fastball velocities among qualifying starters in 2008.]

Reader Comments (25)

A great read, David.

Thanks

July 1, 2009 at 7:32 AM | Unregistered CommenterTrosey

Excellent analysis, David. Thank you for sharing your work. Love to see how the data supports the frequent articles describing the development of pitching prospects and highlights some interesting caveats with current Ranger starters.

Have a fun and relaxing Fourth!

July 1, 2009 at 9:04 AM | Unregistered Commentertexaslifter

Excellent read. Tingled my stat loving brain. Why did you omit Millwood?

July 1, 2009 at 9:25 AM | Unregistered CommenterJim

Thanks for the comments this morning. It's nice to see that at least a few of you are willing to take the time to read the long, technical articles that I like to do.

JIm: I left out Millwood and five other pitchers who have started games for the Rangers because their average fastball velocities fall below 91 MPH (see below).

Millwood's avg fastball velocity - 90.1 MPH
Moscoso's avg fastball velocity - 90.3 MPH
McCarthy's avg fastball velocity - 89.4 MPH
Mathis' avg fastball velocity - 88.7 MPH
Hunter's avg fastball velocity - 88.6 MPH
Benson's avg fastball velocity - 88.5 MPH

July 1, 2009 at 10:28 AM | Unregistered Commenterdavid

Excellent work!

July 1, 2009 at 10:52 AM | Unregistered CommenterDavid

Excellent. It looks like Hunter will be getting a couple more starts. I thought he has a low 90s FB last time he pitched with some good secondary pitches. It will be interesting to see how he progresses.

July 1, 2009 at 10:53 AM | Unregistered CommenterRob M.

Outstanding work, really well-research and well-written.

July 1, 2009 at 10:58 AM | Unregistered Commentertricer

david,

This might be the best one yet. Fantastic analysis with clear explanation of data gathering and usage. THIS is how one should use stats to glean information about prospects and prospective free agents. Much, much better than the "Well, he's got a 1.011 WHIP at AA, so he's clearly a top prospect" analysis I'm seeing too much of on other boards.

Excellent, excellent work.

July 1, 2009 at 11:06 AM | Unregistered Commenterdirty

Solid objective points, David. Terrific analysis and fascinating read!

July 1, 2009 at 11:33 AM | Unregistered CommenterJRB

As always I enjoyed your analysis; however, this does bring more questions to mind. Through Fangraphs (or any other source) do we only have charted fastball velocities for major leaguers, or is there a source where we can get similar data on our prospects? I see velocity ranges for our prospects but not a mean or median velocity.

July 1, 2009 at 11:47 AM | Unregistered CommenterDave H

Rob M - I'm glad that you brought up Tommy Hunter. His average fastball velocity in three major league starts in 2008 was 91.3 MPH. As noted in the comments above, his average fastball velocity in his two 2009 starts has been 88.6 MPH. The difference in the two numbers reflects Hunter's newfound use of a two-seam fastball that he throws in the upper 80's. He still has the 90-94 MPH 4-seamer (which you noted) that he uses as a strike-out pitch, but the sinker could potentially make the big guy the kind of mid-rotation horse that teams like to have every fifth day.

At a minor league game earlier this year, I saw Hunter toying with a vulcan change-up grip. It would be nice to know if the change-up that he has added this year does indeed feature the vulcan grip. He's gone change-up with ~10% of his pitches this year which is another possible reason for the improved results he's gotten.

Many thanks to the rest of you for the compliments. I'll try to work more of these technical articles into my future posts.

July 1, 2009 at 12:00 PM | Unregistered Commenterdavid

Dave H - The fastball velocities of the prospects that are cited in the article are taken from what has been posted by fans, scouts, and Rangers officials on the web. Like you, I would love to find a web site that provides pitch velocities for minor leaguers drawn from minor league games. Unfortunately, I have been unable to locate such a site. Perhaps someone else knows of a way to get pitch velocities for minor leaguers without actually going to the games.

July 1, 2009 at 12:07 PM | Unregistered Commenterdavid

I don't generally post comments to articles, but this one certainly deserves some accolades.

Very good work!

July 1, 2009 at 12:24 PM | Unregistered CommenterCaleb

Nice analysis. I find it interesting that for all the stats, it looks like the pitchers with < 87.5 FB are better than those with FB between 87.5 and 90.0. Is that all because of Duchscherer? Or is there a pattern that MLB pitchers who succeed with below average fastballs have some other very good tool that works for them. Maybe a knuckle ball, or a side-arm delivery, or maybe they just have superior command ala Jamey Moyer. Or maybe there are a lot of crafty old vets who have learned to rely on the art of pitching, rather than FB velocity.

July 1, 2009 at 2:48 PM | Unregistered CommenterNCRF

This is a fantastic read! I bet that you'll be contacted by some teams to go over this data. This is very insightful, well-researched, and a great read.

Just curiously, if ran the numbers again and segmented by righty vs. lefty, does it change any of the data / findings? I wonder if being one or the other offer an advantage because most batters are righties?

July 1, 2009 at 3:30 PM | Unregistered CommenterDavid N - Seattle Rangers Fan

Nice catch, NCRF. The sub-87.5 group is comprised primarily of veterans like Wakefield, Maddux, Moyer, Mussina, Buehrle, etc. who rely on great command and/or quality off-speed stuff. The handful of younger pitchers in this group (Sonnanstine, Marcum, Duchsherer) have managed to stick in the major leagues with outstanding control and by using their off-speed pitches more than 60% of the time on average.

July 1, 2009 at 3:33 PM | Unregistered Commenterdavid

Interesting idea, David N. I'll add handedness to my database this evening and try to answer your question. Thanks for the suggestion.

July 1, 2009 at 3:41 PM | Unregistered Commenterdavid

Exhaustive, excellent work, Spurdy Nasty. Thanks for this!

July 1, 2009 at 3:52 PM | Unregistered CommenterRodney

Wow. You are growing as a writer/analyst, this is the best have I read from you. And that is saying something.

July 1, 2009 at 4:38 PM | Unregistered CommenterGhettoBear04

That was great, David. That was about as clear a look at velocity as I've seen anywhere.

July 1, 2009 at 4:38 PM | Unregistered Commentert ball

I asked this at LSB, but it might be more appropriate to ask here:

Contrary to expectations, there was a very strong correlation between fastball velocity and ERA

What is the actual correlation between fastball velocity and ERA?

r=0.7, r=0.5?

R

July 1, 2009 at 8:23 PM | Unregistered CommenterReq

Than ks again for all of the comments. You've inspired ideas for a couple of more technical articles on pitching that I plan to roll out in the next few weeks.

David N - A quick and dirty analysis wherein the left-handers and right-handers were separated revealed that there is not significant variation in the effects of fastball velocity on the performances of LHP and RHP.

Req - I posted the following on LSB:

I started to include that in the article but decided that most people tend to gloss over those numbers.

Below are two coefficients for each of the rolling average values compared to the rolling average pitch velocity. The first coefficient is for all of the pitchers; the second is for all pitchers with average fastball velocities greater than 87.5 MPH. I included the second coefficient to eliminate the group of effective, low velocity veterans who have found alternatives to good fastballs.

ERA: -0.68, -0.84
FIP: -0.80, -0.92
K/9: 0.83, 0.88
BB/9: 0.36, 0.39
HR/9: -0.67, -0.88
BAA: -0.69, -0.81
BABIP: 0.28, 0.12

The correlation coefficients that approach -1 correspond to stats that are strongly inversely correlated with average fastball velocity. Only BB/9 and BABIP are poorly correlated with fastball velocity.

July 1, 2009 at 11:31 PM | Unregistered Commenterdavid

The difference in velocity between an 89 mph fastball and a 93 mph fastball may actually be greater than 3/100's of a second if you include the slower arm motion of the pitcher with the slower fastball. Batters don't pick up the ball on the way to the plate but out of the pitchers hand. They then extrapolate where the ball will be based upon observed spin and guessed speed. (It is physiologically impossible for them to watch the ball until it meets the bat) There might be enough greater arm speed in a pitcher with a better fast ball to make that task more difficult. Thus it may not be the fastball speed so much as the arm speed.

July 2, 2009 at 12:36 AM | Unregistered CommenterFai Mao

Fai - I would like to hear more. For what it is worth, I've hit 95 MPH fastballs from a pitching machine and it seemed like I was watching the ball as it came toward the plate. The timing of my swing was based upon when the ball dropped into the machine but the placement of the bat was dictated by tracking its path to the plate.

July 2, 2009 at 8:38 AM | Unregistered Commenterdavid

Great article...helped me in a Brewers forum settle a debate...Much appreciated....

September 30, 2009 at 10:21 PM | Unregistered CommenterScoop82

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>