Search
BBTiA Pick of the Week
  • The Texas Rangers: The Authorized History
    The Texas Rangers: The Authorized History
    by Eric Nadel
Powered by Squarespace
Sponsors
« Christmas Time In Texas: Act II | Main | The Nine In '09: Wrap-Up »
Tuesday
23Dec2008

NEWSFLASH: Teixeira Extracts $180 Million Deal From Yankees

Mark Teixeira (pictured) landed a $180 million payday with the New York Yankees on Tuesday. - Samara Pearlstein/MVN.comIt was on June 5th, 2001 that the Texas Rangers, armed with their first top-five overall pick in the MLB First-Year Player Draft since 1989 (which was summarily exhausted on former two-sport college star Donald Harris, an eventual baseball flameout and 12th-round selection of the Dallas Cowboys in the 1992 NFL Draft), tabbed Georgia Tech third baseman Mark Teixeira as the top choice in a Rangers draft class that ultimately yielded just one other major league contributor of note: an eccentric California lefty by the name of Christopher John Wilson, chosen exactly 136 picks after arguably the best first-round selection in franchise history.

Less than six months earlier, team owner Tom Hicks had approved the tendering of what was, at the time, a historic 10-year, $252 million contract to free-agent shortstop Alex Rodriguez, ostensibly locking in a future Hall of Famer at a vital position for the next decade. Teixeira nabbed just a fraction of the guaranteed money coming out of the draft ($9.5 million) that Rodriguez secured through superagent Scott Boras months earlier, but eventually emerged as a superstar in his own right, clubbing 153 homers in 693 career games in a Texas uniform and producing a sterling .283/.368/.533 batting line that, to this day, stands as the third-best OPS in franchise history from a hitter with 1,000-plus lifetime at-bats accrued as a Ranger.

Second on that list is Juan Gonzalez. First on that list is Rodriguez. And so how appropriate it was that two of the greatest players to ever don a Rangers uniform would be reunited by the very team that so callously, consistently and methodically extinguished the Rangers' dreams of deep playoff runs during their late-90s spell of relative prosperity.

The Yankees' blockbuster signing of Teixeira to an eight-year, $180 million deal on the eve of Christmas Eve reverberated throughout baseball, but no doubt came as a particular shock to the Nationals and Red Sox, both of whom were believed to be at the forefront of the Teixeira sweepstakes heading into the last 48 hours preceding Christmas. New York did not formally submit their final offer until sometime Tuesday morning, at which point the two sides worked quickly and cooperatively to hammer out an agreement.

While the Angels had withdrawn from the frenzied bidding war last weekend (and will, as a consequence, obtain the Yankees' first-round pick and a supplemental-round pick as compensation for Teixeira's departure, giving them the 25th, 26th, and 33rd picks in the 2009 MLB First-Year Player Draft  in addition to the sandwich pick generated by Francisco Rodriguez's defection to the Mets -- not a bad haul, but it's getting to the point where the Angels' solid run prevention may be threatened by a dearth of offensive firepower), Boston's eight-year, $168 million offer was evidently bested by just $12 million (one can't help but think that news arrived much to the chagrin of Red Sox owner John Henry), and all the talk of Teixeira wanting to come home to his native Maryland as an Oriole or National was just that -- talk. Boras never even permitted the Orioles the opportunity to sweeten their seven-year, $140 million offer, instead opting to inform team president Andy MacPhail on Tuesday afternoon that his client was "going in a different direction."

Teixeira instantly amplifies the Yankees' 2009 record by approximately four wins, which makes this signing a slam dunk from the perspective of New York general manager Brian Cashman. The Rays may well seek to fortify their prestigious standing as reigning American League champions by making a rejuvenated push for one of the free-agent market's more appealing big bats (Milton Bradley or Pat Burrell, in particular), while the jilted Red Sox could turn back to the trade sector for help behind the plate and/or pursue another starting pitcher with the intention of further strengthening a rotation that already boasts Jon Lester, Daisuke Matsuzaka, Josh Beckett and the ageless knuckleballing wonder, Tim Wakefield.

Theo Epstein is by no means obligated to counter the influx of well-compensated mercenaries poised to suit up in pinstripes next spring by launching his own retaliatory assault on the market, but it certainly wouldn't shock anybody if he decided to do precisely that, and it's certainly my expectation that the signing of Teixeira will act as a catalyst for the remainder of the free-agent market being aroused to action.

It remains to be seen whether the cash-strapped Rangers will legitimately involve themselves in either of those areas, but one thing does seem assured: the off-season is about to get a whole lot more interesting.

And as for Mark Teixeira -- well, never forget the good times:

[The preceding audio was pulled from the July 18th, 2004 Rangers telecast, chronicling Teixeira's game-winning eighth-inning grand slam against the visiting Blue Jays that secured a three-game weekend sweep and a 2½-game lead over the second-place Athletics. Direct link is available here.]

Reader Comments (18)

First

December 23, 2008 at 2:50 PM | Registered CommenterJason Parks

wow, and I JUST got done posting i thought he would sign with Washington or Boston. The Yankees have simply been the Yankees this offseason and spent way too much money to finish no better than 2nd in the division again next season. Hank must have not paid attention when his dad tried to buy all those World Series titles in the late 90's on.

December 23, 2008 at 2:56 PM | Unregistered CommenterRobert Bolyard

This is okay. It puts pressure on the Red sox to get power out of their catcher (Salty), power to answer their questions around Lowell and Ortiz which Teixeira was supposed to answer (Blalock). It puts them in a position of needing us even more than we need Buchholz.

December 23, 2008 at 3:08 PM | Unregistered CommenterMichael Gleason

Sorry-- it also pressures them into landing Lowe, which could trigger the whole deal.

December 23, 2008 at 3:10 PM | Unregistered CommenterMichael Gleason

"We don't have any offers out there on anybody," Cashman said yesterday (12/22)

December 23, 2008 at 3:50 PM | Registered CommenterJason Parks

I was hoping he'd take his tired act over to the NL, but oh well. At least he didn't go to the Angels. I'll count that as a Christmas blessing. When NY doesn't make the playoffs next season, aren't they going to look ridiculous.

December 23, 2008 at 4:45 PM | Unregistered CommenterJDolla$

Appropriate that A-Rod & Teix are back together...
I think it's fun to have a clear-cut "evil empire" to beat.

December 23, 2008 at 5:48 PM | Unregistered CommenterMichael Gleason

The Yankees will Spend 62 Million in Payroll on three Players next season - Teixerra, CC, and Burnett.
Yet here we are sweating over signing Ben Sheets and keeping the TEAM payroll at 67 million.

This makes me sick!

December 23, 2008 at 7:35 PM | Registered Commenternathan_sassaman

Why sick? Who was the last team in baseball to buy a bunch of free agents and then go out and win a World Series the next season?

December 23, 2008 at 7:48 PM | Unregistered CommenterPhil Connors

Marlins ring a bell? Sheffield, Bonilla, and who else did they sign for that first world series?

December 23, 2008 at 10:16 PM | Unregistered CommenterRobert Bolyard

Eleventh! Hey, that's kinda like being first twice, eh? ;)

You know, I gotta say, I kinda figured this would happen all along (the Yanks and Tex). That marrage just made too much sense - a moneygrubbing elite first baseman and a team that uses hundreds for TP with a first base opening. A match made in heaven.

I'm anxious to see how the FA market develops now that the big domino has fallen - like Michael already mentioned, the pressure is now on teams like Boston to make other moves to fill their holes. I have a feeling things could get very busy after the holiday here.

December 23, 2008 at 11:34 PM | Registered CommenterJon Page

What baffles me is that there is no equality in baseball in terms of payroll. Yes I understand that the Yankess paid 27 million in Luxury tax and that they have the resources to use. Tampa Bay is the exception to the rule. They have (for now) a 43 mil payroll the lowest in the AL East. They had to suffer through 10 years of Last place baseball to draft and develop. Do not get me wrong, I am excited as hell about our farm, but Can we not have some sort of balance? I do not think we need to go back to a 125 million payroll. Arod, Chan Ho and all the other scrubs that John Hart brought in were a waste of money.

Wise investment in a Ben Sheets 3/15 and maybe a Ken Griffey 2/10 to play Dh would be wise investments and you are not shelling out major money

December 23, 2008 at 11:36 PM | Registered Commenternathan_sassaman

Sheets, yes ( as long as options get us at least that 3rd year, and hopefully a 4th and 5th). But, with all due respect, Nathan...

Griffey no way. He's exactly whom we'd need to trade away (before Cat, Blalock, Padilla, Byrd, Benoit). We are on a mission to develop the players we've got, and they're already outperforming Griffey. Hank Blalock had better numbers than Griffey last year. Would we have re-signed Hank if we knew he'd repeat last year's April-July? The only reason we re- signed him is that he's his August and pre- injury self. And the only reason we should trade him is
A) We get value in return;
B) We make room for Salty/MaxRam as the DH; and
C) We save payroll to sign Sheets.
If we have to cheat on (a) to speed up (c), that's sad but still better than not signing (multi-year-optioned) Sheets. But if we get Sheets first, or lose out on him, then there's no rush in trading Blalock, who is actually good, and has upside beyond that goodness, and (most importantly) could help us get a Buchholz, Sanchez, Nolasco, Sonnestine or Liz.

December 24, 2008 at 2:27 AM | Unregistered CommenterMichael Gleason

I will say that the one team out there right now that concerns me the most with regard to perhaps swooping in and landing Sheets is the Red Sox, and in that respect I'm not particularly thrilled to see Teixeira in New York -- however, if Boston is truly committed to the likes of Clay Buchholz, Michael Bowden and Justin Masterson, we may see them opting to avoid such a risky multi-year commitment as the one he'll undoubtedly command.

Didn't report this this morning, but apparently the Orioles aren't interested in Sheets either, and I caught somewhere tonight that the Blue Jays were effectively done on the free-agent market for this winter, opting instead to commit to their young players. So that's two more teams out of the hunt.

And by the way, perhaps this entire idea of Sheets-to-Texas is delusional on my part (we still haven't seen any clear indications from the front office that there is sufficient payroll room to make a serious play for him), but I wouldn't be talking so much about it if I didn't have a legitimately good feeling about the Rangers' chances. In any event, I have a feeling that once things are set into motion, they will move very quickly.

December 24, 2008 at 3:24 AM | Registered CommenterJoey Matschulat

Marlins didn't go out and sign 3 of the top 5 free agents in all of baseball. Bonilla was on his last leg and Sheffield didn't get a monster contract. Even so, that was 12 years ago. MLB has proven time and time again that teams need to "grow" their own talent to become a dynasty-type franchise.

December 24, 2008 at 10:02 AM | Unregistered CommenterPhil Connors

16th

December 24, 2008 at 12:41 PM | Registered CommenterJason Parks

You know which teams contribute most to the current problems in baseball? It's the Twins. The Athletics. The Rays. Those teams who have great success (and there's always one or two every season) without a huge bloated payroll, so every idiot can set back and say "Look, the Yankees way off doing things doesn't work, and as long as you draft well, develop talent, ect. ect. ect... you can contend".. The problem is: a.) none of those teams won the World Series, and b.) a team shouldn't have to be run perfect to keep up with the Yankees, who can draft terribly, do everything wrong, miss the playoffs, embarass themselves, and in one fell swoop of an offseason fix themselves. How long to do you think it would take a team like the Pirates or Royals to contend? Would take them no less than 3 years and by then, the top players on those teams (Nate McLouth, Zack Grienke) will be long gone and doing well somewhere else.

December 24, 2008 at 1:05 PM | Unregistered CommenterRobert Bolyard

Okay, somebody with too much time on your hands, post the payroll of each of the last 10 years' league championship contenders, with a " * "beside the winner, and an additional "!" beside the World Series winner.
Additionally, maybe you could inlude at the bottom the number of teams with higher payrolls than that WS winner that year.
Until then, I'm going to enjoy having an Evil Empire to beat.

December 24, 2008 at 7:13 PM | Unregistered CommenterMichael Gleason

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>