What is your opinion of the A.J. Pierzynski signing?
MJH on accountability
Good point. People like not that Eric must lead the most attention starved, low self esteem filled existence that they feel like they must get attention this way.
you guys get to excited.. I know more baseball then most of yall put together, you guys were the probably the band wagon fans that knew nothing about the rangers when they were losing.
we all know that JD isn't going to get rid of prospects, he is sticking to the course and I love it.
if it was me this would be my opening day lineup come March.
1. Kinsler 2B2. Andrus SS3. Berkman DH4. Beltre 3B5. Cruz RF6. Murphy LF7. Pierzynski C8. Moreland 1B9. Martin CF
unless we add Bourn on a one year deal then that shifts Martin to LF and Murphy to the 4th outfielder ( a roll he succeeds in) Profar and Olt will be at AAA for another year of team control.
1. Darvish2. Harrison3. Holland4. Ogando5. Perez, Grimm, Ross or McClellan- unless we sign Lohse to a one year deal and shift Ross and McClellan to the bullpen and Perez and Grimm to AAA for more work.
We are as good as last year, just not as flashy...
eric & homro:
To quote you homro--"post a link or STFU".
WOW-homro is pissed---PMS???
Why do loser always play the 'faggot' card? Kinda makes you wonder.
"I know more baseball then most of yall put together..."
Ricky, is that you?
Joey, please write a colum. This place is starting to implode & die.
Obi-be careful or romro will tell you to STFU.
what the fuck
Moose, if you're new here stick around and you might learn that you don't know as much as you think you do. You sort of undermined your credibility with that theory when you proposed signing Bourn or Loshe. As per the bandwagon comment, a January fan is a true fan of the team. Period.
If you've been around for a while and are posting under a different name because you knew this was a stupid proposal; well at least you knew it was a stupid proposal.
what the actual f*ck
I never said to sign Bourn or Lohse, however what I did say was.. This would be the opening day lineup if it was do start today.. However JD might take a flyer on those guys...
Natural writes: There's as much truth to this rumor as there is truth to the Sandy Hook shooting story... If you don't believe me, check out the Emilie Parker Memorial fund link in the clubhouse. Also notice that commenting has been disabled for that post.
I watched the video, and have also done some subsequent research. Although there are some inconsistencies, namely the Facebook donation pages, the person who made the video also spread false information. The 69 year-old who sheltered the six kids, Gene Rosen, was said to be a member of SAG, but the real Gene Rosen who's a member, is 62 years old.
Secondly, one of the strongest points the guy who created the video attempts to make is that none of the grieving parents were shedding tears in any of the interviews that followed. This is such a weak and subjective basis for crying (pardon the pun) "conspiracy!" because everyone is different. Even psychologists who've spent their entire careers in the field will tell you everyone deals with grief differently, so it's hard for me to buy in with that being his underlying motif throughout the makeshift documentary.
Lastly, he shows a photo of who he supposes to be the deceased Emilie Parker sitting on Barack Obama's lap just days after the shooting, when, really, it's Emilie's sister. The documentary did have some moments that really made me question whether it was some sort of elaborate cover-up for something that may not have taken place, but it seems more like an exploitation of the idiotic mass conglomerate of American teenagers, and, well, American idiots as a whole.
To get away with this, you need to get the government, police department, fire department, hospital personnel, and hundreds of private citizens involved. That seems like an extremely elaborate and expensive avenue to travel through, and it just seems impossible from where I sit.
You're smarter than this, Nat.
Why did I know you were going to take the high road and believe everything you have been fed from the alphabet channels?
Explain this to me Eric. Why are the pictures of "Emilie" with her "family" all photoshopped? Check out the dad's left knee in the family picture with the hay and straw, you will see straw that abruptly ends at Robbie's knee and does not follow through to "Emilie". You will also note that her skull and arms are smaller than her younger siblings. And why are there pictures of Obama actually holding "Emilie" and, note this, only 1 of her siblings?
And why did the RIP Facebook pages start popping up 4 days before the "shooting"?
Why does the license plate called off by the police scanner turn up belonging not to Adam Lanza or his mother, father, brother, family member, etc; but to a known felon named Christopher Rodia?
Why were none of the "parents" allowed to see their children?
Where exactly were all the 600+ children? Did you see any footage of an evacuation?
Why do the words "Sandy Hook" and "Aurora" both appear in the new Batman film?
Where are the security camera shots of Lanza breaking into the school?
What are the chances that each interviewed family with children that had been brutally murdered at the hands of a madman, just hours before, wouldn't shed a single tear? Not one. They all wipe their eyes as if they are crying, but there is no waterworks. Most of them also forget that their tear ducts drain into the sinuses, and it slips their minds that when you cry actual tears, your nose will run. See them wiping their noses? See the lacrimation running out of their noses? Didnt think so. That's fact, science, physiology. It is nearly impossible to cry real tears if you don't truly believe in what you are crying about.
So Gene Rosen is 62, and not 69... I don't see where that is relevant honestly. Looks like a perverted old man to me, whether 62, 69, or 90 for that matter. Why did 6 kids magically show up to HIS house? And why did he say a man was shouting at the kids, and later say it was a woman, and then later say it was a bus driver? Why does he say his Grandkid is 8 years old, but his pet service website says he's 2? Why does he, and several other interviewed individuals involved insist on wearing sunglasses during the interviews?
Why does chief medical examiner H Wayne Carver explain that a good photographer can make anything look how they want? Why does he say all the kids were shot with the "long weapon" which is found later in the trunk of the car? Why does he say "You would think after the THOUSANDS of people I've seen shot"? There are plenty of questions to ask about his speech at the scene.
Why do several different people interviewed say that Nancy Lanza was a teacher at the school, when it's proven that she was in no way shape or form affiliated with Sandy Hook? How many single female parents in Connecticut have a stockpile of assault and conventional weapons, and ammunition to the level that Nancy Lanza had?
Why does nothing the "Nurse" said at the time of the shootings jive with what she said afterwards?
Eric, it doesn't surprise me at all that you believe what you have been told by the mainstream media. I believed it too. You believe what you are told by them because they have proclaimed themselves as the "only reputable source". Tell me why BBC reported that Building 7 of the World Trade Center had collapsed, while the reporter in New York CLEARLY had Building 7 standing directly behind her? Explain that. It's called scripting.
You are smarter than that, Eric.
The answers to these and many other questions posed to the alphabet media typically consist of, "You are a nut.", "How dare you question the media or the government." "It would be impossible to pull something like that off".
You actually gave the same response earlier Eric.
In the 1400's people were called nuts for believing the Earth was round.
Through the course of history, countless people have been imprisoned or killed for questioning governments far and wide.
Until one day in 1903 in Kitty Hawk, powered flight by humans was impossible.
Oh my God
The Natural, You need to go back to the loony bin.
I could use some baseball.
So much with the Natural having any credit on here. GOOD LORD!
Hate the messenger, not the message I guess.
I think the off duty SWAT or police officer running through the woods is a bit odd. He should have been running towards the scene not away from it. The other odd thing, is if he was startled, he is trained to stop and drop, not run and hide? What was he running from?
Notify me of follow-up comments via email.