Latest Forum Topics
Search
Sponsors

Featured Article

MJH on accountability

Sponsors

Sponsors

Forum > This sums it up nicely.....

For any of you Ranger fans that are squeamish about giving Cliff Lee 20+ million / year, this should ease your fears. I guarantee there isn't a fan out there who wouldn't take Greg Maddux in his 30's. Well, Cliff Lee = Greg Maddux. Relax and pay him the money.

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/518718-mlb-free-agency-why-cliff-lee-deserves-roy-halladays-contract

November 17, 2010 at 9:18 AM | Unregistered CommenterFlopShooter

Please don't post a Bleacher Report article to defend any position. That website is a complete joke. Any J/O can write for that site. Just one example...

Auburn Suspends Cam Newton
http://deadspin.com/5687825/bleacher-report-suspends-cam-newton

I think most would agree that BBTiA gives excellent Rangers analysis. Please don't pollute the excellent Rangers coverage with that garbage.

November 17, 2010 at 10:32 AM | Unregistered CommenterWSGJ

Gee, never heard the Greg Maddux comp before.

November 17, 2010 at 10:48 AM | Unregistered CommenterJesse

Hard to comp anyone to Maddux what with his five inches off the black strikezone and the expert doctoring of the ball.

November 17, 2010 at 12:58 PM | Unregistered CommenterPull T

@WSGJ....irregardless of your opinion of Bleacher Report in general, i was merely pointing out that the writer of the article had made some very valid points on why the Rangers would not be out of line with offering Cliff Lee a 6 year deal for big money. Low Risk, High Reward kind of thing. i was basically trying to start a talking point regarding that topic....your opinion of Bleacher Report has no bearing on what i was talking about. so take your snooty attitude somewhere else.

my mom always said "if you don't have anything nice to say........"

November 18, 2010 at 1:51 PM | Unregistered CommenterFlopShooter