Forum > Posnanski SI Article on Hamilton
Posnanski's piece is in response to this Tom Verducci article: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/writers/tom_verducci/08/17/josh.hamilton/index.html?eref=sihp
I'm also not seeing where he stated that Hamilton wasn't one of the top 5 players this season. He notes that Hamilton is tops in WAR on Fangraphs and #6 on Baseball Reference, but he goes on to say that he leans toward the Fangraphs assessment. All he ultimately ends up saying is that Hamilton isn't a better player than Pujols.
Jobert
I'm all for hyperbole, but I found the Verducci column a tad silly. Being the best player in the league in one distinct season and being the best overall player in the league can definitely be two mutually exclusive things.
Joey Matschulat
I actually agree with Joe Posnanski. Hamilton is my favorite player, was my favorite prospect of all time, and is one of the five best hitters in baseball this season; however, he doesn't have the long-term track record to suggest that this season isn't at least a little fluky. I think if he can keep this up for the rest of this year and sit around .325/.400/.600 for the next three years, then he'd have a legitimate case as being on of the top five players.
Dave H


http://joeposnanski.si.com/2010/08/18/getting-started-on-josh-hamilton/
Joe Posnanski makes some very good points, however, I find it incredulous that he thinks Josh isn't one of the type five players in baseball this season, yet deems him the MVP front-runner.
Thoughts?